Over the last three years were ordered around 660 thousand evictions per year in Europe, but two thirds of immigrants remain in the territory illegally, the "worst possible scenarios," Vitorino said today.
"There are policies for legal immigration little after that match the ambitious policies of return very strict," said the Commissioner of Migration that Gulbenkian Forum, speaking at the VIII International Congress of the Portuguese Council for Refugees (CPR), which runs until Thursday at Lisbon, pointed to two consequences of restrictive admission policy, adopted in recent years in the European Union (EU).
"Directly or indirectly, the lack of legal channels of immigration is that there is an incentive for illegal immigration, creating increased pressure on the system of international protection," Vitorino said the panel "The Return of the Directive and the implications for protection Refugees ".
In essence, as there is a common immigration policy in the EU, what happens is that "the decision of who should or should not be admitted and who is expelled is for each Member State and not a coordinated decision" in terms of admission legally, he stressed.
According to former European Commissioner, "those who have motivation to immigrate, given the difficulty of doing so by trying to use legal channels to track the application for asylum as a first port of entry in the destination country."
These people seek benefit of the vesting period of these applications to "create a situation that could lead - in case of refusal - in a situation of economic immigration law in the country of destination," he added.
For Vitorino, is the "pressure" under international protection system that has led the national mechanisms for assessing requests for refuge for asylum to "work under stress and with loss of quality about the content of his decisions."
In this context, consider that the "confusion" about different ways of population flows have a double effect: "States against illegal immigration strengthen the mechanisms for border control, but you can not distinguish between who is entitled to international protection and who are illegal immigrants, there is a pressure of asylum systems, "he said.
At the European level, Vitorino said there are no exact figures on the protection of expulsion measures, stressing that "there are even countries that zealously conceal the reality of these numbers because they do not want to make clear the lack of correlation between the number of expulsion decisions and actual expulsions ".
Vitorino noted that the practical application of the Directive of Return depends on the willingness of others, that is, "of readmission agreements that allow those who have a deportation order from a European country are actually accepted by the country they are being sent , Which is not always the case. "
The absence of procedural rules regarding the identification, as the rules for the transport of criteria and coordination of administrative authorities of two states so that we can operate the remote, "makes the article. 13 of the Law of Return does not apply," considered the specialist.
"There are policies for legal immigration little after that match the ambitious policies of return very strict," said the Commissioner of Migration that Gulbenkian Forum, speaking at the VIII International Congress of the Portuguese Council for Refugees (CPR), which runs until Thursday at Lisbon, pointed to two consequences of restrictive admission policy, adopted in recent years in the European Union (EU).
"Directly or indirectly, the lack of legal channels of immigration is that there is an incentive for illegal immigration, creating increased pressure on the system of international protection," Vitorino said the panel "The Return of the Directive and the implications for protection Refugees ".
In essence, as there is a common immigration policy in the EU, what happens is that "the decision of who should or should not be admitted and who is expelled is for each Member State and not a coordinated decision" in terms of admission legally, he stressed.
According to former European Commissioner, "those who have motivation to immigrate, given the difficulty of doing so by trying to use legal channels to track the application for asylum as a first port of entry in the destination country."
These people seek benefit of the vesting period of these applications to "create a situation that could lead - in case of refusal - in a situation of economic immigration law in the country of destination," he added.
For Vitorino, is the "pressure" under international protection system that has led the national mechanisms for assessing requests for refuge for asylum to "work under stress and with loss of quality about the content of his decisions."
In this context, consider that the "confusion" about different ways of population flows have a double effect: "States against illegal immigration strengthen the mechanisms for border control, but you can not distinguish between who is entitled to international protection and who are illegal immigrants, there is a pressure of asylum systems, "he said.
At the European level, Vitorino said there are no exact figures on the protection of expulsion measures, stressing that "there are even countries that zealously conceal the reality of these numbers because they do not want to make clear the lack of correlation between the number of expulsion decisions and actual expulsions ".
Vitorino noted that the practical application of the Directive of Return depends on the willingness of others, that is, "of readmission agreements that allow those who have a deportation order from a European country are actually accepted by the country they are being sent , Which is not always the case. "
The absence of procedural rules regarding the identification, as the rules for the transport of criteria and coordination of administrative authorities of two states so that we can operate the remote, "makes the article. 13 of the Law of Return does not apply," considered the specialist.
No comments:
Post a Comment